YouTube's New Monetization Rules Confuse Creators: What’s Going On?

YouTube's New Monetization Rules Confuse Creators: What’s Going On?
YouTube's New Monetization Rules Confuse Creators: What’s Going On?
A sudden update by YouTube to its monetization policies has sparked widespread debate and concern among content creators, especially after alarmist interpretations began circulating on social media.اضافة اعلان

On July 15, 2025, YouTube announced what it described as a minor update to its “Reused Content” policy, which is now being referred to as “Non-Original Content.” The platform said the change was intended to clarify the criteria for what qualifies content for monetization.

YouTube emphasized that the goal is to improve transparency and curb the spread of overly mass-produced or repetitive content that offers no original value.

Controversy also erupted in India after authorities arrested popular YouTuber Sameer MD for publishing a video created using AI that contained what officials called "misleading and fictional" information about a sensitive case involving secretly buried bodies in Dharmasthala, Karnataka.

Despite official reassurances, anxiety has gripped the creator community—particularly those who rely on reused footage or create videos using AI tools.

Experts noted in press statements that the updated guidelines are not fundamentally new but aim to clarify previously gray areas. YouTube has consistently stressed the importance of originality and creativity for monetized content.

Digital marketing expert Talha Labib, who manages several YouTube channels, commented:

“The update has caused more panic than it should. This type of content wasn’t eligible for monetization to begin with. YouTube has always favored authenticity and does not welcome repetitive or misleading material.”

Anusha Asif, another digital marketing specialist, noted that the update could directly impact channels that use clips from other creators—such as Reels or Shorts. Even original channels, she warned, may face issues if their content appears overly produced or repetitive.

“In some cases, this could result in a warning or even temporary suspension of a channel, which could negatively affect its visibility in YouTube’s algorithms,” she said.

In a disturbing twist, an American man named Justin Mohn from Pennsylvania reportedly killed his father, decapitated him, and appeared in a 14-minute YouTube video holding the severed head while delivering extremist messages and threatening U.S. officials.

These incidents have fueled growing fears that YouTube will start cracking down on AI-generated content, especially what is known as “AI slop”—highly similar, mass-produced videos created using automation. However, experts clarified that AI-generated content is still allowed, provided its use is transparent and not misleading or fake (such as deepfakes).

Still, some creators see this as yet another obstacle in an already competitive landscape. Tech expert Shahrokh Malik remarked:

“From a viewer’s standpoint, these restrictions may be beneficial. But for creators, it’s a serious challenge. Many will start looking for workarounds, turning YouTube into a constant cat-and-mouse game with content producers.”