The Negreira case has returned to the center of the rivalry between Real Madrid and Barcelona ahead of Sunday’s highly anticipated El Clasico, as accusations and criticism surrounding Spanish refereeing intensify.
اضافة اعلان
Real Madrid supporters are closely watching developments in investigations into payments made by Barcelona to companies linked to a former senior official in Spain’s refereeing system, with some believing disciplinary action against the Catalan club could be only a matter of time.
According to a report by The Athletic, the case has become a central theme in Real Madrid’s media messaging, with the club stepping up its criticism of Spanish refereeing and linking several controversial decisions to payments totaling €8.4 million made by Barcelona between 2001 and 2018 to companies controlled by José María Enríquez Negreira, the former vice president of the refereeing committee of the Spanish Football Federation.
The case came to light in February 2023, when Spanish radio station Cadena SER revealed payments made by Barcelona to a company linked to Negreira. Judicial investigations later expanded to include former and current club officials.
Barcelona and Negreira have repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, maintaining that the payments were made for professional refereeing reports and consultancy services. Club president Joan Laporta said at a press conference in April 2023 that Barcelona had never engaged in any activity aimed at influencing match results or gaining an unlawful sporting advantage.
The judicial investigation included testimony from Laporta and former presidents Josep Maria Bartomeu and Sandro Rosell, as well as former coaches Luis Enrique and Ernesto Valverde and several administrative officials.
La Liga president Javier Tebas said the league could not impose sporting sanctions because any potential violations had expired under the applicable sporting regulations, although criminal proceedings could still be pursued under Spanish law.
In June 2023, UEFA investigators decided not to impose sanctions on Barcelona, allowing the club to continue participating in the Champions League despite the ongoing investigation.
The dispute between the two clubs intensified after Laporta described Real Madrid as the “club of the establishment,” referring to the rule of General Francisco Franco between 1939 and 1975. Real Madrid’s official channel responded with a video featuring archival remarks by the club’s legendary former president Santiago Bernabéu.
Initially, Real Madrid president Florentino Pérez was cautious in his criticism of Barcelona, particularly while the two clubs were cooperating on the European Super League project. His tone later changed significantly.
At a press conference last May, Pérez said referees from the Negreira era were still officiating matches in La Liga and announced that the club was preparing a 500-page dossier to submit to UEFA.
Real Madrid’s official channel has since become a major platform for criticizing referees, regularly revisiting controversial decisions from previous matches and linking them to the Negreira case, particularly ahead of major fixtures or after poor results.
Following Real Madrid’s 2-1 defeat to Atletico Madrid in September, the club’s official website published a report titled “Disastrous Refereeing Performance Decides the Derby,” while analysts on the club’s television channel intensified their criticism of referees.
The controversy has also spread across Spanish media outlets, including El Debate, OK Diario and El Español, as well as the television program El Chiringuito, which have repeatedly discussed allegations of refereeing bias against Real Madrid.
One report published by El Debate triggered a major dispute with Tebas after the La Liga president compared Real Madrid’s media strategy to propaganda methods used by Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Germany’s propaganda minister. Real Madrid subsequently called for Tebas to be removed from his position.
Meanwhile, a group of Madrid-based analysts, influencers and supporters launched a website called “Negreira Gate,” which compiles refereeing statistics and historical comparisons that its creators believe support claims that Barcelona benefited from refereeing decisions.
Lawyer Juan Luis Martín de Pozuelo, one of the website’s founders, said the discovery of Barcelona’s payments to a senior figure within the refereeing system left many Real Madrid supporters feeling deceived, particularly during seasons in which their team enjoyed European success without winning the Spanish league title.
Former Real Madrid coach José Mourinho also revived the issue during a television interview last August, saying he had felt that something was unusual about refereeing decisions during his first spell at the club between 2010 and 2013, although he said he did not know Negreira at the time.
Mourinho continued his criticism during the current season, appearing at a press conference following an Atletico Madrid match carrying documents detailing refereeing incidents that he believed should have resulted in red cards for opposing players.
He also criticized the timing of Vinicius Junior’s four-match suspension following his dismissal against Villarreal, arguing that announcing the decision just two hours before an important European match against Roma raised questions.
The atmosphere of protest also reached the stands at the Santiago Bernabéu, where supporters chanted accusations of corruption against the Spanish federation and displayed a banner reading: “It’s not football... it’s Tebas and Negreira.”
During Real Madrid’s 4-1 victory over Sevilla, fans chanted accusations that Laporta was continuing to make payments, while Barcelona supporters also questioned why Arda Güler was not punished for a possible elbowing incident.
At the European level, UEFA announced in early October that it had received the dossier Pérez had promised to submit, saying the documents would be assessed by its ethics and disciplinary inspectors as part of the ongoing investigation.
Barcelona responded that UEFA had not opened new proceedings against the club, stressing that the announcement concerned the existing investigation rather than the launch of a separate case.
Although some Real Madrid circles expect Barcelona to be excluded from European competitions, there have been no official indications that sanctions are imminent. UEFA has declined to comment on details of the investigation pending a decision by the competent disciplinary body.
The Spanish judicial investigation, which began in March 2023, also remains in the evidence-gathering and testimony stage. Hearings are scheduled for mid-November to hear from former Barcelona player and reserve-team coach Gerard López, who coached the club’s second team between 2015 and 2018, as well as Antonio Alonso, a former stadium official.
In another development, Barcelona has launched legal proceedings against Pérez, accusing him of making defamatory statements during his May press conference. A conciliation hearing has been scheduled for November 25, with Barcelona threatening to file a criminal complaint if the Real Madrid president does not publicly retract his remarks.
These developments have placed the upcoming El Clasico under an extraordinary spotlight, with refereeing decisions now forming part of a conflict that extends beyond sporting competition. Supporters of the two clubs remain deeply divided over the facts of the case and its potential consequences.
Despite the ongoing investigations in Spain and at UEFA, Barcelona has not been found legally responsible for manipulating match results in a final court ruling. Nor has UEFA issued a decision to exclude the club from European competitions.
As a result, speculation over Barcelona’s possible downfall or punishment remains tied to the outcome of proceedings that have yet to be concluded.
Source: The Athletic
