I delayed writing about this topic—not because I was unaware of it, but because I wanted to observe, to read, to carefully study the reactions. Why is Jordan’s role consistently downplayed whenever Palestine is the subject?
اضافة اعلان
Why does Jordan's presence seem deliberately obscured? In my search for an answer, I found more than just political analysis. I found a deliberately reshaped narrative aimed at marginalizing Jordan’s role and sidelining it from decision-making centers—despite the fact that Jordan has been at the heart of the issue from day one.
I won’t delve into history. I’ll begin from the moment famine began devouring what little patience remained in Gaza. Jordan was there. The Hashemite Charity Organization's aid trucks didn’t stop. Jordan conducted the first-ever airdrops under the harshest conditions. Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi remained active on the international stage, sounding the alarm under direct guidance from His Majesty King Abdullah II, who left no platform or opportunity unused to redirect attention toward Palestine.
I concluded that the real danger in this deliberate neglect of Jordan lies in reducing its role to that of a mere "transit point"—not as a strategic partner shouldering the burden of maintaining stability and defending the Palestinian cause. When Amman is replaced by parties lacking Jordan’s depth and commitment, dangerous imbalances emerge in crisis management, and the regional landscape becomes even more complicated. This marginalization not only harms Jordan but also threatens efforts to save Gaza and undermines the chances of reaching sustainable solutions, rendering the entire region more fragile and vulnerable to uncontrollable consequences.
From my personal conviction, I feel the need to address a highly sensitive issue—perhaps it may be interpreted in different ways, but I stand by it: the ongoing marginalization, disregard, and questioning of Jordan’s role in the Palestinian cause—particularly in Gaza—is not a mere oversight. It is a real threat to the cause itself and to regional stability as a whole.
If we examine Jordan’s role—and that of King Abdullah II—we find it deeply rooted in Hashemite legacy and a firm belief that Palestine is neither a burden to be offloaded nor a temporary negotiation file. Rather, it is a cause of justice, dignity, and enduring Arab rights—never to be forgotten or discarded. Unfortunately, this fact is overlooked by some, either unintentionally or deliberately.
The King’s steadfast positions and international engagements are not about scoring appearances or public relations—they are about raising a moral voice in an age dominated by hesitation and political double standards. Yet despite this, persistent attempts continue to marginalize or ignore Jordan’s role—perhaps because it has remained loyal to its principles, refusing to engage in backdoor deals or political bartering, and unwilling to turn critical causes into media stunts or short-term political games.
A timely example is yesterday’s announcement by Germany of an air bridge with Jordan to deliver aid to Gaza. Along with France and the UK, Germany saw in Jordan a trusted partner to channel humanitarian support into the Strip.
However, some would prefer that this trust not translate into real influence on the ground. What they want is for Jordan’s political voice to remain confined to the margins—bearing the heavy burdens and fulfilling difficult tasks, while the political narratives are shaped and praise harvested in other capitals, far from Jordan. This is why I reiterate: the continued marginalization of Jordan does not serve the Palestinian cause, nor does it contribute to regional stability.
In the end, what is happening in Gaza is a test for all—and another test of how the world treats those who carry the burden on the ground. And if there are some who do not see Jordan as a first-tier political partner in the Palestinian cause, then history, geography, and blood see it as the last unbroken Arab backbone—one that has never betrayed, never exploited, and never wavered.
