U.S. President Donald Trump is deploying his political operation’s financial resources to defend the Republican majority in Congress, while many candidates from his party have shown less enthusiasm for adopting his slogans, advice and campaign strategy.
اضافة اعلان
With advertising reservations and planned spending totaling about $138 million, alongside widespread caution over his call for candidates to embrace his approach, a delicate dynamic is emerging: Trump’s ability to finance the campaign does not necessarily mean he can shape its political messaging, particularly when candidates in competitive districts fear that close association with him could become a liability.
The contrast reflects differing approaches to voter mobilization. Trump is seeking to energize his base and regain momentum by promising $5,000 payments to American adults if Republicans retain control of Congress. Meanwhile, Republican candidates are seeking to appeal to voters dealing with high prices and the consequences of the war in Iran, amid low approval ratings for the president, according to several polls.
Financial Mobilization Comes Late
According to The New York Times, Trump’s political action committees reserved substantial advertising resources over a 10-day period to support Republicans in the November midterm elections. The spending follows criticism from Republicans of MAGA Inc., which has nearly $400 million in resources, over whether it was prepared to use its financial strength to help party candidates.
The campaign is being conducted through three political action committees. No Going Back reserved more than $95 million in advertising, while Safety and Affordability, which receives financial backing from MAGA Inc., reserved $27 million, according to two people familiar with the plans. MAGA Inc. itself reserved an additional roughly $9 million, so far limited to the Texas Senate race.
When spending on direct mail and text messages is included, planned expenditures reach approximately $138 million in support of candidates in nearly 50 races. The figures represent money reserved or allocated for spending, rather than funds already spent.
The reservations suggest a division of roles. No Going Back has allocated roughly two-thirds of its reservations to Senate races, while Safety and Affordability has focused on 15 House races. The largest planned Senate spending is concentrated in Michigan, Ohio and Alaska.
The financial links between the committees, however, remain unclear. The New York Times reported that the two new committees were established in early September, allowing them to commit substantial sums before mandatory deadlines for disclosing donor identities.
A Gap in Political Messaging
The financial response has not been matched by a similar political response. A Washington Post analysis of more than one million social media posts found that most Republican candidates continued using their own messages even a week after the party’s Dallas convention, where Trump presented what he described as his formula for winning the midterms.
At the beginning of the year, Republican politicians mentioned Trump or the MAGA movement in roughly one out of every six social media posts or podcast appearances. That share has fallen by about half as the year progressed, according to the analysis.
Some candidates have removed references to Trump from their websites, while others in competitive races declined to attend the Dallas convention. By contrast, Democrats have continued to highlight Trump, with his name appearing in about 20% of their posts during the early part of this week, according to The Washington Post.
The figures point to a difference in campaign strategy: Democrats are seeking to associate Republican candidates with Trump’s record, while many Republicans appear to be maintaining greater flexibility to tailor their messages to local voters.
The data do not indicate a broad revolt within the Republican Party. Social media analysis captures public messaging and does not fully reflect candidates’ organizational relationships with Trump. It does, however, indicate that many candidates do not view emphasizing his name as a strategy suited to every district, even as they benefit from political and financial support connected to him.
$5,000 Proposal Poses Questions
Trump’s proposal to provide $5,000 payments illustrates the challenge. The message may appeal to voters facing a rising cost of living, but it also raises questions for Republican candidates about funding and the federal deficit, without an enacted program they can point to.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has said building consensus would take time, while Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he had not been informed about the proposal before Trump announced it at the Dallas convention.
Republican Sen. Rand Paul objected to describing the payments as “dividends” while the federal government is running a deficit. Sen. John Kennedy also rejected the idea of borrowing $1.2 trillion to finance the checks.
Sen. Bernie Moreno, meanwhile, pledged to introduce legislation after the election, saying it could reduce the deficit without specifying how the payments would be financed.
Republican strategist Chris Saxman, quoted by The Washington Post, expressed doubts about the proposed policy while acknowledging that its potential appeal could attract voters facing economic difficulties.
Trump’s financial operation therefore gives Republican candidates additional campaign resources, while the party continues to face differing approaches over how closely candidates should align their messaging with the president. The Republican midterm convention in Dallas was explicitly designed to mobilize the party, but The Washington Post found that many candidates have continued emphasizing their own campaign messages.
