Talking about a cabinet reshuffle is no longer a matter of seasonal speculation or media leaks. It has become an objective necessity dictated by changes on the ground and by the performance of the government team itself. Today, the issue goes beyond merely switching names or recycling positions — it reaches a deeper level concerning the essence of public administration and its readiness to keep pace with the rapidly evolving challenges both domestically and internationally.
اضافة اعلان
Given the delicate and complex phase we are going through, there are numerous accumulating challenges and unresolved issues that leave little room for maneuvering. This reality has also brought a serious question to the forefront: Is the current government team qualified to keep up with the pace of this phase?
All eyes now turn to Prime Minister Dr. Jaafar Hassan, who assumed office with high expectations that he would usher in a new standard of government performance — expectations rooted in his well-known administrative track record and extensive experience managing sensitive economic files. While his government is still in its early days, initial assessments of its performance reveal a noticeable disparity among its members, which once again raises the need for a partial or comprehensive reshuffle — one that bolsters the strengths and addresses the weaknesses.
If there is a relative consensus on a key strength of Hassan’s current government, it is the economic team, which operates under his direct supervision. This team is credited — as is becoming increasingly recognized by the public — with achieving early signs of improvement in economic and administrative approaches compared to previous administrations. It appears to be the most aligned with the Prime Minister’s vision and, so far, the least subject to public criticism, placing it outside the scope of any likely reshuffle as long as it continues to deliver effectively within the announced objectives.
On the other hand, some ministries continue to suffer from weak performance or confusion in handling their portfolios. This has affected the overall image of the government and widened the trust gap in certain sectors. Therefore, any cabinet reshuffle — whether limited or extensive — must reflect a clear commitment from the Prime Minister to self-monitoring and continuous evaluation, steering away from stagnation or political courtesy.
Should a reshuffle be officially decided, it would signify the maturity of executive performance rather than its instability. It would not be seen as a sign of failure but rather as a conscious reformist move aimed at improving the quality of public administration and reinforcing the principles of accountability and merit.
Ultimately, Prime Minister Jaafar Hassan’s ability to distinguish between individual and institutional performance — to identify what needs to be changed and what deserves to be strengthened without favoritism — will shape the next stage. What is needed today is a more cohesive government that builds on its successes, addresses its shortcomings, and retains what has proven effective, in order to continue the path of reform with confidence, clarity, and minimal disruption or risk.
