The governing body of the Grammy Awards voted Friday to
change its nominating process, eliminating a step that has recently come under
fire: the use of anonymous expert committees to decide who makes the final
ballot in dozens of categories.
اضافة اعلان
Each year, the
Recording Academy convenes music
professionals to serve on its nomination review committees for 61 of the Grammys’
84 categories. They whittle down the initial nomination choices by the
academy’s thousands of voters to determine the ballot, and their work is
intended to protect the integrity of the awards process.
The committees began in 1989, but in recent years they have
come under intense criticism from artists, music executives and even Grammy
insiders as examples of an unaccountable system rife with conflicts of interest
and mysterious agendas.
Before this year’s Grammys, held in March,
The Weeknd — a
performer who had been shut out of the nominations despite the success of his
latest album, “After Hours” — announced that he would be boycotting the show
from now on and focused his blame on the nomination process.
“Because of the secret committees,” The Weeknd told The New
York Times, “I will no longer allow my label to submit my music to the
Grammys.”
The Weeknd’s rebuke came after years of complaints by
musicians, particularly Black artists in genres such as hip-hop and R&B,
many of whom have been lauded repeatedly in genre categories but blocked in the
four most prestigious awards: album, record, and song of the year, and best new
artist. Among the most outspoken have been Jay-Z, Drake, Kanye West, and Frank
Ocean.
At this year’s ceremony, Beyoncé became the most-awarded
woman in Grammy history, with 28 wins. But of her career total, only one prize
was in a major category, when she took home the 2010 trophy for song of the
year as one of the credited songwriters on “Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It).”
In a statement, Harvey Mason Jr, interim CEO of the
Recording Academy, praised the decision by the academy’s board as part of “a
year of unprecedented, transformational change” at the institution.
“This is a new academy, one that is driven to action and
that has doubled down on the commitment to meeting the needs of the music
community,” Mason said. The proposal, discussed for more than a year, involved
a special committee of academy members and leaders, the organization said.
The workings of the nomination committees have long been a
subject of intrigue in the music industry. The identities of the committee
members are kept secret to protect them from outside influence and fan attacks,
according to the academy.
But the process came under particular scrutiny last year,
when Deborah Dugan, the academy’s former CEO, made a number of detailed
accusations as part of a legal complaint over her ouster from the organization.
According to her complaint, many people on the committees
had conflicts of interest. In an example she gave, an artist in the running for
song of the year was allowed to sit on the committee for that category and was
also represented by a board member.
Last year, the academy instituted a rule that
musicians on
the committees must sign disclosure forms to prevent conflicts.
The decision to cut the committees was made during a meeting
of the academy’s board of trustees. Although they are being eliminated for the
four top prizes and all genre categories, review panels will remain for 11
so-called craft categories, which cover awards for production, packaging, album
notes, and historical recordings.
The board also decided to reduce to 10 from 15 the number of
genre award categories on which the academy members may vote, beyond the top
four prizes, and added two awards: best global music performance and best
musica urbana album, a Latin category.
The changes will take effect with the 64th annual Grammy
Awards, to be held January 31, which will cover music released during a
13-month window from September 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021.
Read more
Trending stories
.jpg)
.jpg)
