The case file opens in an interrogation room. The story usually starts years earlier.
It starts with absences a school logs but does not chase, with fights a family calls mischief, with a boy who spends longer and longer outside the house looking for attention he is not getting at home.
اضافة اعلان
Then the gap widens. He stops going to school. Supervision thins. His friends change. In recent years a second door has opened alongside the street, because the phone now carries him into closed groups, into content that makes violence look like heroism, and toward people willing to offer the acceptance he is looking for.By the time any of this becomes a criminal case, it has already travelled a long distance.
This investigation follows that distance. It draws on criminal statistics published by the Public Security Directorate, cases reported in the media, written responses from the Ministry of Social Development and the Ministry of Education, and interviews with specialists in sociology, education and digital security. The question it puts is narrower than the case numbers: what happens to a child before the offence, and does anyone act on it in time?
More than 2,000 cases a year
Public Security Directorate figures show juvenile delinquency is not a marginal category in Jordan's criminal statistics.
The data recorded 2,159 juvenile cases in 2023 and 2,466 in 2024, an increase of roughly 14.2 percent. The figure for 2025 came in at 2,451, fifteen cases below the previous year. The 2024 rise did not reverse. It held.
Theft accounts for a large share. The 2023 breakdown lists 413 theft felonies, 1,014 theft misdemeanours and 13 vehicle thefts, together more than two thirds of that year's total.
These are counts of recorded cases, not of individual children. A single case may involve more than one party, so the figures should not be read as a net number of juveniles entering the justice system. What they do show is the volume that police, courts and welfare institutions handle each year.
Geographically, the 2023 cases divide as 862 in the capital, 556 in the north, 463 in the central region, 226 in the south and 52 in rural areas. The capital carries the largest share, but no region is untouched.
Sociologist warns of a shift toward graver offences
Sociologist Dr. Hussein Al-Khazai argues that juvenile offending in Jordan has taken a more serious turn, with offences once associated almost exclusively with adults now appearing in juvenile files: murder, attempted murder, aggravated robbery, sexual assault and kidnapping.
Two cases reported by the Public Security Directorate this year illustrate the pattern. In July, security forces found the body of a juvenile in the Muwaqqar district. An examination showed signs of violence and identified strangulation as the cause of death.
The investigation led to the arrest of a 17-year-old, who confessed, according to the Public Security Directorate spokesperson. In February, a dispute inside a house in southern Amman left one person dead and his father wounded.
The Public Security Directorate identified the perpetrator as a minor and a friend of the victim, and said the case went to the judiciary once investigations concluded.
The point of citing these cases is not to make juveniles frightening. It is to ask when the behaviour that ends this way begins.
School sees it first, and often too late
Educator Dr. Ayesh Al-Nawaisah places the school at the earliest stage of detection.
He lists the academic markers first: a sharp and sudden drop in performance, repeated or intermittent truancy, loss of interest in school activities, difficulty concentrating.
The behavioural markers matter as much. Excessive aggression toward classmates, vandalism, theft, habitual lying, complete withdrawal, attachment to suspicious groups outside school, angry outbursts, low tolerance for frustration, a stated sense of not belonging.
Schools tend to read these as discipline problems rather than as signals calling for psychological and social assessment, according to Al-Nawaisah. That reading determines what happens next.
He acknowledges that the Ministry of Education has machinery for this, including the Educational Guidance Directorate, school counsellors, behaviour monitoring records, guidance committees, parental contact, and referral to the Family Protection Department when behaviour extends beyond school grounds. The gap he identifies is one of timing. The machinery engages after the change is already visible.
Teachers are not always trained to manage difficult classrooms or equipped to handle complex psychological cases, Al-Nawaisah adds, while counsellors are often absorbed by administrative and paperwork duties at the expense of the intervention work that is their actual function.
His sharpest warning concerns what happens to the hardest cases. Expulsion, dismissal or transfer to another school substitutes for a long-term treatment plan, and the school stops being a protective space and becomes the point at which a child exits into the street.
Dropout removes the framework
Al-Nawaisah treats dropout as one of the main drivers of delinquent behaviour among young people, on the grounds that school does more than teach. It ties a student to a community, structures their time, and supplies a network of relationships, supervision and support.
Losing it leaves a child more exposed to negative peer influence, to the street and to drugs.He grounds this in the social bond theory of criminologist Travis Hershey, which holds that strong social attachments reduce delinquency.
The Ministry of Education states that it has produced a procedural guide on dropout, with operational definitions of absence, truancy and dropout, mechanisms for tracking cases, preventive and remedial measures, coordination with other agencies, and a reporting channel for follow-up.
A guide does not settle the question of reach. Registering a student as a dropout records the outcome. It does not establish why the child left, or whether that reason points to greater risk.
Family conditions raise risk without determining outcomes
Al-Khaza'i treats family breakdown as a central pressure, because separation and divorce weaken monitoring, supervision and the family's capacity to absorb a child's difficulties.
He lists what families can observe before an offence occurs: neglected schoolwork, harmful friendships, late nights, sums of money the child cannot account for, aggression at home, and coarse or hostile language. A parent's criminal record or drug use inside the household adds further risk, and a child living with a drug user encounters that behaviour as something normal and close at hand.
Al-Khaza'i is explicit that none of this is deterministic. Family breakdown, poverty, dropout and the presence of a drug user do not produce a delinquent child on their own. The danger comes from several factors accumulating while nothing intervenes. He stresses the distinction so that prevention work does not end up stigmatising the most vulnerable children and families.
Drug cases appear in the juvenile figures directly. Data gathered for this investigation records 268 juvenile drug-related cases in 2023, falling to 169 in 2024 and holding at 169 in 2025, with the 2023 and 2024 files showing patterns across trafficking, possession and use.
The digital environment as an accelerant
Information security and cybercrime specialist Dr. Imran Salem describes the digital environment as a possible intermediate stage between exposure to content and real-world behaviour.
Establishing that link takes more than finding an account on a child's phone, according to Salem. It requires tracing a sequence: searches for crime-related material, contact with closed groups, communication with specific individuals, then a change in behaviour or the production of content imitating what was consumed, before anything happens offline.
Violent material on a minor's phone does not establish causation. The child may already be carrying behavioural, family or social problems, with the digital environment acting as a trigger or an amplifier. In other cases, Salem notes, there is direct grooming or incitement.
He points to desensitization as the mechanism that matters most, where repeated exposure to content that frames crime as heroic or exciting erodes the response to it. Recommendation algorithms compound this, serving more of the same material once a user engages with it.
The risk extends past passive viewing. Salem describes game chat rooms and closed groups being used to approach children and build trust before moving the conversation to more private platforms, with extortion, cyberbullying, threats, financial fraud and the circulation of illegal content now part of the environment minors move through.
Families can watch for a sudden shift in how a child handles their phone, multiple accounts, withdrawal, acute anxiety, or unexplained money and possessions.
Inside the care system
When prevention fails, the case moves to the Ministry of Social Development.
In its response to Al-Ghad, the Ministry set out the sequence. A juvenile enters a rehabilitation centre on a court order, arrest warrant, judgment or judicial police letter, accompanied by a preliminary forensic medical report and identity documents, and a comprehensive file is opened.
A psychological, social, health, educational and legal assessment follows within the first days. A diagnostic committee then builds a plan and places the juvenile in educational, vocational and behavioural programmes, before preparation for release and reintegration begins.
The Ministry told Al-Ghad that the programme is not determined by the offence alone. Age, case circumstances, psychological and social condition, educational level, family situation, abilities and inclinations all feed into it, along with the case study findings. The stated objective is to address the behavioural, social and psychological factors behind the offending and return the juvenile to family and community.
Programmes include individual and group counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy, anger management and conflict resolution, family support, and sports and cultural activities. The Ministry measures results through repeat offending rates, behavioural change and discipline, participation in education and training, specialist reports, reduced aggression indicators and improved communication skills.
Aftercare forms part of the restorative justice framework and normally runs from six months to a year, extendable under the law or on assessment of the individual's stability at home and in the community.
The same factors, before and after
The Ministry attributes recidivism to family breakdown, absent supervision and support, social stigma, rejection by community or peers after release, negative peer influence and dropout.
That list is the same list the experts give for why children offend in the first place.
A juvenile completes an individual rehabilitation plan and returns to an environment that has not changed. Counselling sessions inside a centre do not alter the conditions outside it. This is not an argument that the programmes fail, and it is not a claim that the Ministry has done nothing. It is a statement about where the limits of individual rehabilitation sit.
The Ministry names its own constraints: needs that vary widely between individuals, behaviours that resist treatment, families with limited readiness to support a juvenile after release, and a shortfall in specialised psychologists, social workers and supervisors.
Where the gap actually is
The gap is not a missing institution. It is the space between the ones that exist.
The school holds part of the picture. The family holds another part. Social development holds a third. Public security usually arrives once the behaviour has become an offence. No body collects these signals while they are still signals.
Al-Nawaisah identifies weak coordination between school, family and official agencies as the largest failure. The school refers responsibility to the family, the family regards behaviour as the school's business, and the child passes between them without anyone building a single intervention plan.Handling remains reactive, triggered by behaviour that has already surfaced, rather than preventive.
His proposed shift is one of framing: from treating a child as a disruptive student to treating them as a student showing signs that warrant assessment and intervention. Punishment applied to aggression rooted in trauma, domestic violence, peer pressure or a psychological problem addresses the behaviour and leaves the cause running.
More than 2,000 juvenile cases a year pass through the system. Theft dominates the totals, drugs appear consistently, and a small number of cases reach killings and stabbings. The risk factors are documented and the experts agree on them. What is missing is a system that gathers the signals and acts on them before they turn into a file.
Protection does not begin when a care facility door opens. It begins the first time a child's behaviour changes and someone decides to ask what is happening to them.
Source: Al-Ghad. Reporting by Mona Abu Hamour.
