For Gazans, the day after also involves investigating Israeli war crimes

gaza
(Photo: Twitter/X)
gaza

Osama Al Sharif

Osama Al Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman.

Since the first week of Israel’s war on Gaza, now approaching its third month, the US and some Israeli officials and media commentators began talking about the day-after scenario, meaning what happens when the guns go silent and the fog of war is dispelled. Most of these scenarios assumed one thing: That Israel would be able to achieve its two declared objectives from the war by uprooting Hamas from Gaza and freeing Israeli captives being held there.اضافة اعلان

But now, after more than 80 days of Israeli carpet-bombing and artillery shelling, which even CNN now admits that it is “indiscriminate” and that “nearly half of the Israeli munitions dropped on Gaza are imprecise dumb bombs,” destroying more than 60 percent of the Strip’s buildings, Israel is far from fulfilling either goal.

The bombing of Gaza has been described as the most vicious since the Vietnam War. More than 20,000 Gazans have been killed, 70 percent of whom were women and children. More than 50,000 have been injured so far. Aid trucks passing through the Rafah crossing daily are insufficient, according to the UN, which also says that Gazans now face the spread of disease and famine. Many thousands will die because of the cold and lack of medicine, food, and clean water.

Still, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insists that Israel will continue to fight until victory; now a goal that appears elusive if not impossible. There are mounting calls in Israel for his dismissal while support for the war among Israelis is dropping by the day. Hamas and its allies continue to rain rockets on Israeli towns and cities while inflicting a heavy toll on the invading army.
But despite all this, Netanyahu and his Far Right coalition partners want the war to continue at any price. The Israeli premier is refusing to listen to the Israeli relatives of the captives, who now support a deal that would end the war and secure the safe return of their loved ones. The Biden administration is losing public support at home, with almost half of the American people, if not more, now wanting a lasting ceasefire. The US is becoming isolated even among its allies, most of whom now disagree with giving Israel the green light to massacre its way in Gaza.
Support for Gaza and Palestine has reached record levels around the world, aside from the obstinate position of the US government, with the majority now supporting calls for a permanent ceasefire. Much has changed over the past two and a half months. Most of the Western mainstream media (MSM) are now critical of Israel’s handling of the war, and an increasing number of pundits are now accusing Israel of carrying out a losing battle while pointing to the possibility that it is also committing war crimes. On social media, young people from all over the world are lining up to condemn the war and voicing solidarity with the Palestinians.

But despite all this, Netanyahu and his Far-Right coalition partners want the war to continue at any price. The Israeli premier is refusing to listen to the Israeli relatives of the captives, who now support a deal that would end the war and secure the safe return of their loved ones. The Biden administration is losing public support at home, with almost half of the American people, if not more, now wanting a lasting ceasefire. The US is becoming isolated even among its allies, most of whom now disagree with giving Israel the green light to massacre its way in Gaza.

But as of the day after, Netanyahu and the US don’t see eye-to-eye. Where the Israeli prime minister, now fighting for his political life, wants long-term Israel security control of Gaza, which means open-ended occupation, Biden and even most Israelis disagree.

An Egyptian proposal to secure a long-term hiatus in return for freeing the captives while opening the path for a joint Hamas-Palestinian Authority control of Gaza, without being specific about Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, has reportedly been rejected by the Hamas military wing. It is no secret that a stop of the war now would mean a resounding defeat of Israel, a fall of the war government, and a reckoning for Netanyahu.

But what most omit from possible solutions and scenarios are two things: One, Gazans want an immediate end to the war now because every day means hell for those who are lucky to survive the day. The US blind support for Israel means that every minute, every hour, and every day, more Palestinian civilians are killed. That cannot be tolerated by the international community any longer as well.
The second issue is not who will rule Gaza once the bombing stops but how will the international community step in to save millions who are displaced and living in catastrophic conditions. Israel must not be allowed to decide how many aid trucks are allowed to pass through Rafah and other crossings when the lives of millions are at stake. The world must make recompense for its failure to uphold international humanitarian law and save many thousands of innocent lives because the US and Israel believed that so-called collateral damage was acceptable in this case.
The second issue is not who will rule Gaza once the bombing stops but how will the international community step in to save millions who are displaced and living in catastrophic conditions. Israel must not be allowed to decide how many aid trucks are allowed to pass through Rafah and other crossings when the lives of millions are at stake. The world must make recompense for its failure to uphold international humanitarian law and save many thousands of innocent lives because the US and Israel believed that so-called collateral damage was acceptable in this case.

But what is also important and urgent is that an independent investigation of what happened on October 7,  and after must be carried out, and pronouncements must be made. It was ironic that the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Karim Khan, accepted an invitation to meet the Israeli families of those held captive. Yet, he would not come close to the Gaza Strip or make a strong statement on allegations, to be verified, of massive Israeli war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing charges against Israel in Gaza.

The credibility of the ICC and its reason to exist are now in question as Khan and the court remain silent on what Israel is committing in Gaza. By the last count, about 100 journalists and their families have been killed by Israel. Doctors, medics, university professors, activists, poets, artists, UN workers, and thousands of children have been killed. Hospitals, universities, schools, mosques, churches, civic centers, and residential buildings have been demolished. There are reports of mass executions of civilians. If Khan is unable to act, then he should resign now. Otherwise, he is not fit to hold office, and he is discrediting the ICC and its purpose.

There have been dozens of cases filed at the ICC concerning the killing of journalists, children, and crimes by Israeli officers, and the complicity of high-profile political figures in war crimes. Khan cannot ignore these cases, all of which name Israel as the main culprit.

The day after for Gaza is not only about who would rule the besieged and now leveled strip of land where 2.1 million Palestinians, 70 percent of whom were already displaced or refugees, used to live.

Netanyahu, his lieutenants, and his generals are war criminals. They should be investigated and tried. Those who supported this genocidal war must also be named and charged. In a perfect world, this would be the right thing to do. But our is not an ideal world, and the war on Gaza should set a process to create a world order where warmongers and killers of babies should become an example so that no repeat of the carnage in Gaza can become possible ever again.


Osama Al Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman.


Disclaimer: 
Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Jordan News' point of view.



Read more Opinion and Analysis
Jordan News