FinTech innovations that are transforming the financial landscape

Illustrate a bustling, futuristic cityscape at dusk, showcasing a blend of advanced financial technology innovations. Include towering skyscrapers wit
(Photo: Ai-Generated)
Illustrate a bustling, futuristic cityscape at dusk, showcasing a blend of advanced financial technology innovations. Include towering skyscrapers wit

Hamza Alakaleek

Hamza Alakaleek has graduate degrees in International Political Economy and International Business Law from Yarmouk University and University de Montreal with focus in Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection.

The rapid ascent of the FinTech sector in recent years has redefined the landscape of financial services, ushering in an era of unprecedented accessibility and innovation. Yet, alongside its transformative potential, the industry grapples with a host of risks and challenges intrinsic to its digital realm. The speed and global reach of digital transactions have inadvertently provided fertile ground for illicit activities, ranging from money laundering to cybercrime. Such threats pose significant risks to the integrity of the financial system and demand vigilant mitigation efforts from FinTech firms. While technological advancements have bolstered fraud detection, perpetrators continue to refine their tactics, exploiting emerging technologies like generative AI and ChatGPT to obscure fraudulent activities.اضافة اعلان

The financial toll of fraud extends beyond the banking sector, affecting industries like e-commerce, where soaring transaction volumes coincide with escalating fraud losses. The projected global sales volume of $8.1 trillion by 2026 underscores the scale of potential losses, with digital payments fraud forecasted to reach staggering figures in the coming years.

The financial toll of fraud extends beyond the banking sector, affecting industries like e-commerce, where soaring transaction volumes coincide with escalating fraud losses. The projected global sales volume of $8.1 trillion by 2026 underscores the scale of potential losses, with digital payments fraud forecasted to reach staggering figures in the coming years.

Accordingly, FinTech platforms are susceptible to money laundering, as criminals exploit their speed, convenience, and cross-border nature to legitimize illicit funds. Thus, there are various kinds of financial crimes where FinTech may be helpful for criminals such as Terrorist Financing: The anonymity and global reach of FinTech platforms can unwittingly facilitate terrorist financing, necessitating robust monitoring and control mechanisms. Fraud and Identity Theft: FinTech services' digital nature exposes them to fraud and identity theft risks, requiring stringent security measures and user verification protocols. Cybercrime and Data Breaches: FinTech companies are prime targets for cybercriminals due to the sensitive customer data they handle, necessitating robust cybersecurity measures to prevent data breaches and fraud. Regulatory Non-Compliance: Failure to adhere to AML and KYC regulations can lead to severe penalties, highlighting the importance of robust compliance measures. Insider Threats: Internal risks from employees or insiders exploiting system vulnerabilities for fraudulent activities pose a significant threat to FinTech firms. Third-Party Risks: Collaborations with third-party service providers can introduce additional risks if not accompanied by thorough due diligence and oversight.

Combat fraud
On the other hand, the recent implementation of PSD2 regulations in Europe aims to combat fraud by mandating payment providers to enforce two-factor authentication for transactions. While this shift transfers the responsibility for fraud prevention from merchants to payment providers, it has resulted in a notable decrease in transaction conversion rates. Therefore, many shoppers either abandon their purchases at the authentication stage or struggle to complete the two-factor verification process. However, this presents a call to action for FinTech companies. For this reason, the regtech sector should be innovative. Both traditional financial institutions and FinTech firms urgently require approaches that optimize fraud prevention processes, minimize losses to fraudulent activities, and prioritize a positive customer experience.

Originally, innovation focused on developing robust rules-based platforms analyzing web traffic or transactional data to identify fraud based on historical patterns and statistical models. For instance, VISA's acquisition of CyberSource in 2010 aimed at precisely this, and more recently, Equifax acquired Kount for similar purposes. Subsequent innovation has harnessed additional data sources and employed machine learning and deep customer profiling techniques. For example, Ravelin integrates machine learning, graph networks, and behavioral analysis to detect fraud and boost payment acceptance rates. Nethone specializes in helping e-commerce and financial institutions reduce payment fraud through advanced end-user session profiling, with a focus on mobile channels. Meanwhile, Seon concentrates on identifier reputation checks, enriching purchaser context based on identifiers like email, phone number, and IP address passed via APIs.

Separate silos
By the same token, fraud prevention, KYC, and anti-money laundering (AML) efforts operated in separate silos. However, a shift towards a more holistic "FRAML" approach, exemplified by Hawk AI, is emerging. This integrated strategy combines fraud and AML considerations across various operational areas, such as onboarding and personalization to enhance conversion rates, or risk assessment for underwriting decisions to combat fraud and KYC challenges. Delving deeper, there are the key characteristics that successful players in this space must possess to improve customer journeys and conversion rates while effectively mitigating the risks of fraud and identity theft.

Traditionally, the primary focus has been on data accuracy, particularly in identifying false positives and negatives. Additionally, Effective fraud protection requires continuous monitoring beyond individual controls. This involves regularly checking assumptions and comparing real-time activity to the data provided during onboarding. Hence, Local data centers, while costly, facilitate real-time monitoring and address regulatory requirements related to local data management.

Furthermore, machine learning models enable a real-time and automated feedback loop in fraud detection. These models are trained on historical data to learn behavioral patterns and detect anomalies or suspicious activity. Additionally, automation speeds up suspicious activity reporting by reducing manual intervention. Machine learning algorithms continuously adapt to new fraud patterns through ongoing model retraining. Thus, Open box architecture enhances transparency by allowing merchants and financial institutions to understand why a transaction is flagged.

Therefore, maintaining high approval rates with low fraud incidence is crucial when expanding to new use cases. This not only impacts product performance but also influences the business model. Providers undertaking risk exposure must be vigilant to avoid negative impacts on cost structures, especially as some anti-fraud providers offer chargeback guarantees. For instance, serving new products, such as digital goods like cryptocurrencies, poses unique challenges due to instant transfers and limited time for fraud detection compared to traditional e-commerce.

Therefore, maintaining high approval rates with low fraud incidence is crucial when expanding to new use cases. This not only impacts product performance but also influences the business model. Providers undertaking risk exposure must be vigilant to avoid negative impacts on cost structures, especially as some anti-fraud providers offer chargeback guarantees. For instance, serving new products, such as digital goods like cryptocurrencies, poses unique challenges due to instant transfers and limited time for fraud detection compared to traditional e-commerce.

Similarly, Strategic partnership decisions, whether with underlying merchants or payment providers, can significantly impact fraud prevention efforts. While merchants possess more data, payment providers offer scale and some degree of indemnity. Then Cross-channel and multi-channel capabilities, particularly web and mobile, are increasingly important, especially in mobile-first emerging markets. Thus, while companies strive to enhance the customer journey, bad actors persist in exploiting vulnerabilities. Nevertheless, there is a lucrative opportunity for smart FinTech to simultaneously improve customer experiences and enhance security within the ecosystem.

Consequently, robust AML compliance measures are paramount where FinTech companies, renowned for their innovative solutions and seamless customer experiences, play a pivotal role in upholding AML standards and protecting their platforms. From initial customer onboarding to ongoing transaction screening, FinTech firms must establish comprehensive AML controls to effectively detect and prevent financial crimes.


Dr. Hamza Alakaleek is a Corporate Lawyer and Tax Attorney with post-graduate degrees in International Political Economy, International Business Law, and Law and Technology with a focus on (IoT, AI, DPA & CSL).


Disclaimer: 
Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Jordan News' point of view.



Read more Opinion and Analysis
Jordan News