Breaking News:
Breaking News:
A security and strategic studies scholar, senior lecturer,
The developments of the escalating war between the United States and Israel on one side and Iran on the other show that overwhelming airpower has not achieved a decisive victory that can be relied upon to declare a convincing win. The American Secretary of Defence and the American President have repeatedly used the term Obliterated, which means destruction or erasure without any trace, to describe the strength of the air campaign against Iran. According to this term,
Iran’s response—targeting Gulf states in addition to Jordan—came as a strategic surprise to Washington, which had largely built its war plan on the assumption that eliminating senior leadership would trigger rapid Iranian capitulation. This assumption overlooked a critical reality: the Iranian regime appears to view this confrontation as existential, and is therefore inclined to expand the scope of conflict and raise its costs for all parties involved.
On the morning of the last day of February, the United States and Israel carried out a high-level strike on Iran that resulted in the killing of several senior Iranian leaders, most notably the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The assassination of the Supreme Leader represents a major turning point in the structure of the regional order. Targeting the head of the regime in a state of Iran’s magnitude is not merely a military strike; it is a strategic event that reshapes the balance of power and raises profound questions about deterrence, intelligence capabilities, and the future of the regime itself.
Since al-Qaeda launched its attacks against the United States in September 2001, followed by the U.S.-led Global War on Terror, Washington entered a phase of what the Copenhagen School of security studies calls the “securitisation of the terrorist threat.” Terrorism was framed as an existential threat that justified extraordinary measures outside the traditional framework of politics. This securitised mindset manifested in mobilising and financing allies to wage a global war against terrorism.
The proposed Sunni trilateral alliance—if it moves beyond political protocol—represents a new regional alignment capable of reshaping the map of alliances in the Middle East. The three states possess notable complementary capacities across economic, military, political, and demographic domains, as well as an ideological dimension, represented by Sunni Islam, the largest religious component in the Islamic world.
Iran is facing the most severe and complex existential threat since the Iranian Revolution led by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979. The ongoing protest in Iran that has persisted for more than two weeks, resulting in hundreds of deaths and injuries, is escalating rapidly within an exceptionally sensitive geopolitical context. While these protests are not unprecedented, Iran has been subjected to many protests and faced with lethal repression as well. However, what differentiated the current protest and made it dangerous is its convergence with the gradual collapse of Iranian power and deterrence internally and externally. These pillars has consituted the base of Iran's security doctrine and a core source for its domestic legitimacy.
The terrorist attack carried out by Navid Akram and his father, which resulted in the killing of 15 Jewish individuals celebrating Hanukkah on Bondi Beach in Sydney, marked a dangerous turning point in Australia’s security and political landscape.
For some, the homeland is a space of employment and opportunity; for others, it is an enduring emotional anchor—a quiet heartbeat marked by longing, memory, and attachment that time and distance fail to erase. It is the place of birth, the field of childhood games, and the site of first social bonds. Despite persistent economic, social, and political challenges, the homeland retains a privileged position in the consciousness of expatriates. It remains the primary emotional refuge, reference point, and source of identity.
TOP STORIES
Editor's Picks
