Constitutional Court Rejects Challenge to the Unconstitutionality of a Civil Retirement Law Clause

The Constitutional Court decided to reject a challenge regarding the unconstitutionality of paragraph (b) of Article 32 of the Civil Retirement Law No. 34 of 1959 and its amendments, citing that it was not sufficiently connected to the case in accordance with the Constitution and the law.اضافة اعلان

According to the court’s ruling issued on Tuesday, the challenge against the constitutionality of Article 32(b) of Civil Retirement Law No. 34 of 1959 and its amendments was deemed inadmissible due to the lack of a proper link between the Constitutional Court and the case, in line with the Constitution and applicable law. The decision was based on the fact that the trial court had refrained from examining the merits of the unconstitutionality claim, in accordance with established constitutional jurisprudence and legal doctrine.

PETRA