How to ruin a competition law

Lower House approves 2022 Social Security Law Parliament
(File photo: Ameer Khalifeh/Jordan News)
Lower House approves 2022 Social Security Law Parliament

Yusuf Mansur

The writer is CEO of the Envision Consulting Group and former minister of state for economic affairs.

A few days back, both houses of Parliament approved a new, deformed, and paralyzed Competition Law. The steps and time it took to finally trash such a vital piece of legislation (actually the most important law in any developing country) should be made into a course on how not to do politics. The outcome of the exercise is excruciatingly painful and will become a source of embarrassment for years to come.اضافة اعلان

The push for a competition law in Jordan began in 1996, first through the persistence of the World Bank, and later as a condition from the World Trade Organization and the Jordan-EU Association Agreement. The process was delayed time and again due to the frequent reshuffles and changes of ministerial cabinets and the ignorance of some high-ranking officials about competition, antitrust, anti-monopoly legislation. The private sector too was against the creation of the law, which was understandable as the law attacked abuse of monopoly power and collusion. It took time to educate some of those in charge (including ministers, judges, lawyers, and representatives of chambers and unions) about the merits of such a law and the need to introduce it.
The law met the highest standards and best practices for countries like the US and EU nations, except for one flaw… it was weakened by the fact that its implementation was handed to the Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Supply
Top-notch legislation Finally, the law was born, but as an emergency, temporary law, in 2002 when Parliament was not in session. It was later confirmed as a permanent law in 2004. Interestingly, Jordan was the fourth Arab country, I believe, to introduce such a law. Arab nations were and still are reluctant latecomers to antitrust legislation.

At the time, the law met the highest standards and best practices for countries like the US and EU nations, except for one flaw. In most Arab countries, including Jordan, when the law was finally introduced, it was weakened by the fact that its implementation was handed to the Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Supply, instead of a fully empowered designated department or commission. Therefore, in Jordan, as in other countries in the region, it was up to the minister, not the directorate, to implement the vital mission of the law, which was to protect competition within the economy. The Jordan National Agenda, released in 2005, noted this weakness and recommended a study into remedying it by 2008. However, nothing happened. At any rate, Jordan finally had a competition law.
Certain articles focused on consumer protection legislation were added to the competition law. The articles stood out as odd — they simply did not belong in such a law.
Odd additions In 2011, to appease certain groups and avoid unnecessary conflict in a year of possible runaway agitation as the Arab Spring spread, certain articles focused on consumer protection legislation were added to the competition law. The articles stood out as odd — they simply did not belong in such a law. Any economist with some knowledge of antitrust laws would have raised a huge fuss.

The latest edition Last year, to please the IMF, the government insisted that certain “modifications” were to be made to this already weakened law. Not one of the experts who helped draft the original law was consulted, and when one or two were invited to attend discussions, their advice fell on deaf ears, or was treated as inconsequential. Accordingly, March 2023 saw the birth of a deficient competition law.
Not one of the experts who helped draft the original law was consulted, and when one or two were invited to attend discussions, their advice fell on deaf ears, or was treated as inconsequential.
You probably have quickly sensed a high level of upset and dismay in my writing about this ill-constructed law.  And you would be correct! Years of work and diligence, which entered into the making of a world-class piece of legislation, have simply been wasted. What was a standard of excellence has been swept away by one tidal wave of incompetence after another.  


Read more Opinion and Analysis
Jordan News